![]() Sarah ((no branch, rebasing story/hare-and-tortoise))$ git checkout story/hare-and-tortoise To push the history leading to the current (detached HEAD) Sarah ((no branch, rebasing story/hare-and-tortoise))$ git pushįatal: You are not currently on a branch. Sarah ((no branch, rebasing story/hare-and-tortoise))$ git commit -m “added new text” Sarah ((no branch, rebasing story/hare-and-tortoise))$ git add. Sarah ((no branch, rebasing story/hare-and-tortoise))$ vi story-index.txt To abort and get back to the state before “git rebase”, run “git rebase -abort”.Īnd git created a new branch for me “sarah ((no branch, rebasing story/hare-and-tortoise))” where i could see both changes in my test file “remote repo changes” and “my changes which i pushed from feature branch to remote repo” then i tried to sort this file in this current no branch by running the following command and still i am not able to resolve this: You can instead skip this commit: run “git rebase -skip”. “git add/rm ”, then run “git rebase -continue”. Resolve all conflicts manually, mark them as resolved with Sarah (story/hare-and-tortoise)$ git rebase masterĬONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in story-index.txtĮrror: could not apply 43c4766… added text Now as i dont have latest files and other changes so i went back to master branch and did “git pull origin master”, changes have been pulled from remote repo but when i again went back to my feature branch and ran “git rebase master” i got the error message: Now the scenario question is let’s say i am on my feature branch and i have updated one file and added some text and pushed it to remote repo and after pushing the changes i realised that remote master branch is already updated with different text in remote repo. I wan to bring all those updates to my local master branch first and then i would like to do git rebase master from my feature branch. Now my local master branch doesn’t have all those files and updates. Where C6 adds C3 and C5 to the master branch plus the merge commit which includes any conflict resolutions that need to be applied.I have remote repo and its main branch has all the latest changes. That’s what this diagram is getting at:Ĭ4’ is the same diff as C4, but it’s now applied after C3 instead of C2. Rebasing applied a different strategy: it takes the point where the two branches (upstream and current) diverge, resets to that point, applies the changes from upstream and then the changes from the current branch. A merge applies the updates from the upstream branch by creating a new commit (the merge commit) in the current branch that contains the changes and, in the case of conflicts, any changes you’ve made to address those conflicts. Merging and rebasing are two mechanisms for keeping a branch in sync with an upstream branch. If you want to clean things up, then the thing to do is a git rebase -interactive and remove the merge commits. Generally, you shouldn’t mix both merges and rebases on a single branch because it gets messy. Should do the same Don’t worry too much about what commits show up in the commits tab on GitHub… This tends to happen when you mix two methods of keeping a branch up to date, e.g., both doing a git merge of master and then a git rebase. ![]() You can also rebase on branches you don’t have checked out, e.g., git fetch upstream master If you are on branch X and you do git rebase -i master, it changes branch X, not master, so you would have to push branch X.Ĭonclusion: Pull upstream changes to the local master branch, then check out your branch and rebase when required (You would have to commit any local changes to that branch first). $ git pull -rebase upstream master #-On local master branch to pull changes from upstream.` I follow a somewhat repetitive workflow but it helps Pull changes from the Upstream Repository into the local master branch With that, the result of running git rebase master dev, where dev is out of sync with master, will create new commits (and thus hashes) with the same content as those on dev but with the commits on master inserted before them. If you reorder commits you will change commit hashes rebasing (when it does something) will change commit hashes. Each commit hash in Git is based on a number of factors, one of which is the hash of the commit that comes before it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |